Part of the MABTW blog network - Last Updated Blog - El Chauvinisto

Archive for September, 2006

Blind Dates and Privilege Princesses

Thursday, September 28th, 2006

The idea for this topic came up from a set of comments over at Dakota’s, in his magnificently titled thread “Are Androids Better than Women?” One male commenter, “Chris”, argued that men needed to be quite wary of women these days. Another commenter, female, “Zogmama” argued that it was still appropriate for men to be courtly, to be gentlemen.

I have sympathy for both perspectives, of course. From Zog’s perspective, the general decline in civility in our society affronts me — as a man, as a human being, and as a conservative. Moreover, treat every woman as though she’s a ho, and that’s likely what you’ll get.

Rap videos showing Nelly swiping a credit card through some ‘ho’s’ buttocks are an undeniable legacy of some ghastly fusion of feminism and misogyny.

On the other hand, for commenter Chris? A great many women in North America have enormous privilege — social, financial, biological, and legal. As he puts it:

I said before…. women act like this on CREDIT. They have done NOTHING to show, prove or earn ANY special status where men are concerned… and until they do…. it’s a man’s … responsibility to POINT IT OUT!

However….. Men are nice. Too nice. When women behave badly , we WANT to be nice and say things like “what’s wrong?� instead of “Why are you behaving like total BITCH?!� We see something wrong, identify it and WANT to fix it. We WANT things to WORK. The NICE and EASY way. It’s the way we are made. But gents, if you do this with a woman, it will NOT WORK. You will be AMAZED at how GOOD it can be for YOU to say something to the effect of ….

“I don’t accept second class behavior from anyone and I am not enjoying myself. Unless I am enjoying being around you, I will not want to be. If you want me to be with you, respect you, enjoy you, and be entirely committed to you, you will have to give me good reason to be. Or you may leave. It’s entirely up to you.â€?

This desire (on the part of men) to fix things is very much the case, and sometimes it exists to our detriment. Sometimes, we are reluctant to see that the problem is the woman in question and her atrocious behavior.

Here’s a story of a truly disastrous blind date — it’s worse than any tale I have, but not infinitely so. Remember, this is a first date; two people of ordinary middle-class means getting to know one another. Sadly, it’s not so far out of any man’s experience, just an extreme example of more of the same.

My date for the evening opened her purse and pulled out a sheet of paper, unfolding it purposefully. On it, were questions (a cross examination) she wanted to pose to me, so as not waste time of there was not a ‘meeting of the minds’ and a shared idea of ‘priorities.’

My interrogator wanted to know how much I would allot her to spend on clothes. She wanted to know how often we might vacation, and where. What type of travel and accommodation arrangements would I make? Would I bestow a gift of jewelery once a month? What would be her allowance? How large a home she wanted and a decorating budget were mentioned, with the express proviso that the budget was not written in stone. She also believed that fine dining 3 to 4 times a week was not unreasonable. I just listened. At no time was there any reference to what was in it for me.

My evening’s companion then perused the menu and ordered the most expensive item, as the waiter gently hovered over us. I ordered a plate the establishment was well known for, a salmon dish. It then asked if she could order the wine. Being a gentleman, I agreed. She then ordered a $225.00 bottle of wine.

His response? He complimented her on her choice of wine, excused himself from the table, got up, and unobtrusively left the restaurant.

A staggeringly rude, ungentlemanly, and discourteous thing to do. But one, I think, that was entirely appropriate under the circumstances.

You can read the rest of the story. Suffice to say, the friends who’d set him up with her were enraged at him… at first.

My experience in the United States and Canada has been that women are stunningly willing to sleep around and dole out sex like it’s going out of style. Many will rent their bodies for little more than the price of a burger. Then there’s another group. The Privilege Princesses, such as the woman described above.

This seemingly leaves a huge number of women falling into one of two camps: they either view themselves as worthless, or so staggeringly beyond price that no man could possibly be worthy of them, however deep his bankroll. A cynic would say, of course, that these latter are simply much more expensive whores with a very high degree of self-esteem.

In both cases, they appear to hate and envy men and to be profoundly bitter.

Of course there are women that do not completely fall into these categories. (or even at all!) Thank goodness. But even most of the best women seem to have more than a hint of either the whore or princess about them. The phrase ‘high maintenance woman’ springs to mind.

It should go without saying, but I’ll say it before any female abschickeners beat me to it: Of course there’s a whole set of negative behaviors from men, some of which I touched on above in the coarsening of our culture. To a certain degree, the cheap whore motif exists because it’s what some men want, and what a great many women think all men want. The expensive whore motif seems to exist because it’s what a great many women seem to want. And if you read the blind date story I linked to, you’ll see the (male) author links to a female blogger’s blind date story that, if anything, is even weirder (though perhaps slightly less horrific).

Speak away, one and all. Bad blind dates? Is my judgment fair? Or is a recent break-up with a lovable, but horribly high-maintenance woman impacting my own judgment?

-wolfe

“Respectfully submitted”

Wednesday, September 27th, 2006

This is a wonderful phrase that I’ve used in the past, and, to my great pleasure, one commenter on this site used.

You put forth a bunch of ideas, and close with this.

Why do I love it so as a phrase? For several reasons.

First, there’s a degree of courtesy to it. This is valuable in this wicked world.

Second, there’s an engineering/scientific echo to it that I just love.

The person saying it isn’t saying “My ideas are perfect and you are a moron”, she/he [I will henceforth use he to indicate both masculine and feminine] is saying:

“I respect your intelligence and your capacity for peer review. I am submitting this for intelligent peer review and discussion. I have faith that you will treat my ideas and writing with the same respect I am now treating you.”

He’s not saying “I am submissive”. Submitted does not imply that (unless you’re a moron). Neither does respect.

Now, I definitely don’t want to see a rash of “respectfully submitted’s” on this blog. I really, really, don’t. Most of you should use it no more than a few times a year. Of course, those of you that are scientists may use it whenever you want.

For the rest, if you say something that you think is extremely controversial, or might hurt someone’s feelings, GO BACK. Make sure your arguments are logical. Make sure you make your perspective clear. Then, sure, consider “respectfully submitted” as a closing.

Most importantly, in the immortal words of Bill and Ted, “Be excellent to each other”.

Best, the sometimes excellent
-wolfe

Two-headed snakes and Pandas

Tuesday, September 26th, 2006

Astute readers of this blog will grasp the reason for posting on these things. Alas. I had some great panda pics just for someone, but have mislaid the URL.

I shall look, but for now, this is Wednesday’s post.

2 headed snake

A 2 headed snake. Credit: unknown

 

Mom and daughter

No, not some weird Panda-lesbo-love but a mother and her daughter.
Credit: San Diego Zoo
-wolfe

Which of Superman’s powers…

Monday, September 25th, 2006

 

But Clark Kent, now there was a real gent…

Superman never made any money
For saving the world from Solomon Grundy
And sometimes I despair the world will never see
Another man like him

– Crash Test Dummies, ‘Superman Song’.

 

Day by Day Cartoon

Day by Day cartoon copyright by Chris Muir.

What can I say? It made me laugh. So which power of Superman’s would you want to use for good? Other than X-Ray vision?

Without the character of Clark Kent backing up that power, it becomes a trickier question. As Lord Acton famously said, “power tends to corrupt…”
-wolfe

Dakota Smith Rants

Sunday, September 24th, 2006

…is the name of Dakota Smith’s new blog on the mabtw network.

Dakota’s intelligent, courteous, writes well, and tends to be not without opinion. Coupled with a strong libertarian perspective, I’m sure this will make excellent fodder for a very fine blog.
I suspect he and I will find lots to agree on, and lots to ‘agree to disagree’ on. I respectfully look forward to both.

His first post, “Are Androids better than Women?” probably falls more into the second category, but there’s a tremendous amount of meat in there. Just one small snippet:

Then there’s the issue of fidelity. In a 2002 Canada Globe and Mail article, it was reported that researchers have discovered that 10% of all children weren’t sired by the woman’s husband.

Consider that for a moment: 10% of all children have a father other than their familial one. Since not every sexual intercourse leads to pregnancy (indeed, as a father, I know it really can be work to produce a child), this hints at tremendous numbers of women who routinely cheat on their husbands. If one out of ten are getting pregnant by someone else, how many are cheating but are smart enough to use birth control? 50%? 75%? No study can adequately guage, because the majority of women would lie to the poll-taker.

Maybe he’ll have me preferring gyndroids yet…

Do please keep in mind that he’ll have his own rules on posting which will differ somewhat from those that are here — i.e., you’re in his living room over there.

The comments for this post here are for Female (and any others who wish to talk about Dakota’s blog or its contents without posting there). In Female’s case, I understand she and Dakota have agreed she’s not going to post at his blog site.

Good luck Dakota!

-wolfe

(Crazy) American Woman

Saturday, September 23rd, 2006

American Woman, stay away from me
American Woman, mama let me be
Don’t come a hangin’ around my door
I don’t wanna see your face no more

– ‘American Woman’ by The Guess Who.

It used to be rock musicians we imagined singing this about groupies. We didn’t imagine the ‘mama’ would be literal.

I recognize there’s a degree of tautology inherent in that title. Be that as it may, here’s a great parenting technique, brought to us by warm and nurturing American mothers: (And yes, obviously, most mothers thankfully aren’t like this. I think. Yet.)

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A Montana mother who allowed her 18-month-old baby daughter to inhale from a marijuana water pipe on several occasions was properly convicted, but should not have to spend five years in jail, a U.S. appeals court ruled on Friday.

Jessica Durham was photographed allowing her toddler Michala to suck from a marijuana water pipe, also known as a bong, in 2004 by a friend upset about the activity.

“Ms. Durham allegedly remarked that smoking improved Michala’s appetite and left Michala lethargic and mellow - a manner she found consistent with her own experience smoking marijuana

h/t Patterico.

I’d like to think there was a time when that would have been unimaginable. I mean maybe you could see a parody of a stoner idiot dad doing it. Maybe. But a mother who’d borne the baby for 9 months? And cared about her daughter? And surely wanted more for her daughter than she had?

Not now, I guess.


This helpful young woman seems to be ably replicating
the message the mother, above, is sending to her child
(and society). Fortunately this young woman isn’t sending
that message to a small child, but merely, we assume,
to an adult who’s annoyed her.
Source: Google Cache of “Snowboarding in July”

And this happened in Montana, of all places. You’d almost expect it in Northern California, but Montana?

I’m baffled. Where the heck are we going as a society?

-wolfe

Montreal Shootings (3)

Saturday, September 23rd, 2006

Jan Wong, a Toronto journalist, seems to agree with much of my basic thesis on the Dawson college shootings.

What many outsiders don’t realize is how alienating the decades-long linguistic struggle has been in the once-cosmopolitan city. It hasn’t just taken a toll on long-time anglophones, it’s affected immigrants, too. To be sure, the shootings in all three cases were carried out by mentally disturbed individuals. But what is also true is that in all three cases, the perpetrator was not pure laine, the argot for a “pureâ€? francophone. Elsewhere, to talk of racial “purityâ€? is repugnant. Not in Quebec.

Not surprisingly, her remarks have drawn outrage from many, including the Premier of Quebec and the Prime Minister of Canada.

Jan Wong’s argument [is] prejudiced, absurd, irresponsible and without foundation.

I’ve great respect for the PM. I think he’s a pretty good guy. But, he’s trolling for votes in Quebec, and, sensibly, has no desire to open old linguistic wounds. He’s desperate to avoid being painted as “right-wing” by a media that’s very hostile to him. Finally, he didn’t spend the time growing up in Quebec that a good number of my family did. He’s seen primarily the best of Quebec; I’ve seen the best (which is great indeed) and the worst.

I know few here have great interest in this topic, but I wanted to follow it up. I think the challenge of building stable, happy societies from diverse cultural elements will remain one of the great challenges of the 21st century for the West.

I hope we succeed. I don’t think Quebec is a great model to follow on this, though it’s great in many other respects.
-wolfe

An email address for contact

Friday, September 22nd, 2006

If there’s some feedback you wish to give, or something more personal you wish to say, the best way to reach me is to email wolfeblog at the domain of hotmail dot com. (Hope that’s clear enough and will still foil spambots).

If you want to remain pseudonymous/anonymous, get an account on yahoo, hotmail or gmail. In general, I specifically recommend people never use their work emails to comment on matters of controversy … anywhere.

UPDATE I - 23 Sept: More emails than I expected, including some from people I didn’t know were even reading the blog. That’s very nice to see, and I’ll be responding to each one individually over the weekend (except the woman who thought it worth wasting both her time and mine to simply tell me “ur blog sux”. I don’t mind criticism — indeed I welcome it — but it should be constructive. And literate.)
-wolfe

Home and Dry

Thursday, September 21st, 2006

Atlantis landing early in the am
Chris O’Meara, AP.

 

Landing in darkness, the space shuttle Atlantis returned safely to earth today, bringing home her 6 astronauts. There likely won’t be shuttle flights beyond 2010, and there will be, at most, only a few more landings in darkness between now and then. Treasure the sight.

 

-wolfe

Good for him.

Thursday, September 21st, 2006

the faint call of distant kin, across the deep-time of human pre-history
-wolfe

Looking resolutely backwards, today’s post is, in some ways, the opposite of yesterday’s, though both concern explorers. Here we speak of a man who, six years ago, made a startling find that’s only recently received attention.

Dr. ZERESENAY Alemseged [NB- where the 'surname' or formal name of someone is not the final name, I try to all-CAPS the first reference of it] has lead an investigatory team in Ethiopia for 7 years now. Back at the end of the 20th century, they set off for the north-eastern deserts of the country, the Afar region. They discovered something quite startling. They came to realize their discovery was the most complete fossil record of someone almost — but not quite — human ever discovered.

Dr. Zeresenay and the skull of 'Selam' [Pax, Peace]
Dr. Zereseany holds up the skull of ‘Baby Lucy’ aka Selam.
Photo credit: Max Planck Institute via BBC.

We’ve all heard, I’m sure, of Lucy, that most famous putative ‘missing link’ discovered in the 1970’s. Australopithecus afarensis, dwelling 3 to 4 million years ago in eastern Africa, bipedal (walking upright) and probably partly arboreal (tree-climbing and dwelling) is widely believed to be a common ancestor of all mankind.

There are several catches though. Well, heck, just see Lucy’s fossilized remains, below:

Lucy
Photo: Daniel Acosta.
Released to Public Domain. Via Wikipedia.

There’s not much of the skull there. Oh, there’s a fair bit, but we’re depending upon a lot of guesswork and reconstruction.

No hands, no toes. The torso and shoulders are at best thin gruel. Some have legitimately complained that this is pretty weak beer to base a ‘missing link’ (or even portion thereof) upon.

Dr. Zeresenay’s discovery is startling, though. Here’s the skull, and a sketched reproduction of the skeleton indicating what parts were ‘guessed at’ and what were actually found:

Selam's (Baby Lucy's) skull
Photo Credit: apparently Zeresenay Alemseged
via journal Nature and then Globe and Mail.

(Note that the top of the skull — the darker bits — is ‘estimated’. That said, the curvature is a superb fit, and I have extremely high confidence. Yes, the girl could have been a conehead. No, I don’t think she was. Unlike Lucy, this is a rather astonishingly complete skull, legs and torso).

 

Image from Patricia J Wynne via Scientific American of Selam's (Baby Lucy) Skeleton recovery and reconstruction
Image by Patricia J. Wynne. via Scientific American.
The brown bits indicate actual fossil recovery. The white bits indicate best guess/estimate reconstruction.

 

This is amazing. We’re receiving the faint call of distant kin, across the deep-time of human pre-history. Across millions of years, a poor, three-year-old girl tells us a great deal.

As for Dr. Zeresenay? It needs to be said: There aren’t enough Ethiopians that are investigating their country’s glorious ancient past (in this case not merely ancient, but pre-historic). He’s one. I’m sure he had to go through some tough times to succeed. Good for him. In this case, assistance credit goes to France where he studied and Germany where he nominally works (MPI).

sources used: BBC, Nature, Scientific American, Globe and Mail, Max Plank Institute, Wikipedia.

-wolfe