Part of the MABTW blog network - Last Updated Blog - El Chauvinisto

Archive for November, 2006

Luka’s Temporary(?) Blog here…

Thursday, November 30th, 2006

Luka’s cool, I owe her a debt of explanation why I detest the rhymes of one of her favorite poets.

She’s highly rational — doesn’t make her right, but she’s always prepared to discuss why she isn’t.

Her aim is to have a site that discusses gender in a sensible way. If you’re a new reader, I highly recommend her; if you’re an old reader, you know her. Check her out here. Her rules are grossly similar to mine.

Take care, Luka,

And you’re blogrolled, baby, as “Wonderful Luka”! (sorry, even Diesel had to endure being called “baby” by me when I blogrolled him!)

-wolfe-baby.

On Cowardice

Thursday, November 30th, 2006

Language advisory in this post.
I should have been a coward. I can’t imagine why I did what I did other than testosterone and arrogance. Yeah, wolfe is occasionally arrogant. Sorry.

Here’s the story. My telling it arises out of a post on MABTW where SotS said “Fleeing from a battle you did not ask for is the epitome of cowardice.”.

I thought that statement was foolish and poorly thought out. And I respect the lad greatly. But he was a damn fool for saying what he said. (And only I’m allowed to say that; he’s a respected member of this community, so don’t give him a tough time.)

Here’s a true story.

When I was younger, I’d just come back from a camping trip. So I’d changed into “suit wolfe” garb, looking like every Wall-Street businessman (except my suit was off-the-rack), carrying my Samsonite briefcase. But I still had some of the accoutrements of the trip.

And I’m walking along a park pathway, consumed in my thoughts. Yeah. Bad situational awareness. At least it’s broad daylight.

So a bunch of tough young punks (16-21), about 6 of them, close in on me. Again. Bad situational awareness.

“Hey dude. Give us your money”.

He held a knife. 4 to 5 inches, if you want to know. Some kind of crap switchblade. Weak, as Eric Cartman would say.

“Piss off”. (I don’t normally use vulgarity but I’m certainly not going to refrain from doing so when scumbags are trying to rob me).

“Give us your money or we slice you up”

Inwardly, I chilled. Death was near and I could feel the soft silent beat of his wings.

Controlled, I said “I need to open my briefcase”.

Slowly, I did so. I reached in, and I made my choice.

My thumb flicked the leather sheath’s latch and my glorious hunting knife, brought back by (my at times too distant) Dad, from Austria, came forth, naked.

I had to pull it out of the case carefully, scraping the sheath off the blade.

I couldn’t resist.

I looked at the young punk’s 4 or 5″ blade.

“You call that a knife? Now this is a knife”

I drew on memory… I sure didn’t need to draw on courage; my veins were on fire.

“There are 6 of you. If you rush me, you will win, and get my wallet. I will kill three of you, I guarantee it. Two more will be badly wounded, and the final may escape unscathed”

I couldn’t believe time stood still long enough for me to say that. It sounded like something out of the movies. It was. I wasn’t running on my courage, I was running on society’s representation of old-school male courage. And it fucking worked for me.

“But three of you will die, I guarantee it. The rest of you will be wounded, perhaps crippled, and all for forty dollars in my wallet.”

“Do you wish that”?

And they retreated. They ran.

I was almost disappointed.

Yet had I fled from this battle? I’d not be a coward.
Hell no.
I’d have been smart. I was an idiot. If I’d been married my wife would possibly have been justified in divorcing me on this. I made an arrogant call, to engage where I could have fled.
Yet. Fleeing from a battle you did not ask for is NOT the epitome of cowardice.

I was an idiot for behaving as I did. If I’d been smart, I’d have done the ‘cowardly thing’. Doesn’t make me a coward, simply makes me a human being. A man. As it was, I as arrogant, and risked it all on a toss of the die. I won. I was ‘brave’. And damn near got myself killed.

I’m no more a man for saying “you call that a knife”? and standing up, than I’d be for fleeing. That’s that.

Note that the calculus changes totally were I with a woman. My sole goal then, would be her survival. Then my arrogance would be courageous and appropriate. Alone? It was stupid and arrogant. Foolish. But I’m a man. And that’s that.
-wolfe

Good books to read.

Wednesday, November 29th, 2006

UPDATE: 30 November 2006. a) I didn’t link Diesel; remedied. He inspired this post. b) Diesel’s brother-in-law, John, died earlier this week. Please keep John and his family in your thoughts and, where if you pray, in your prayers.

“Yes. All the books have to be in English.”

“So no Pynchon or Joyce?”

Diesel

Alas, I’m posting too slowly… So, here’s where I steal someone else’s idea, respond to it, and turn it into a post.

These are just a few rapidly sketched thoughts. What are your favorite slightly lesser-known/intellectually regarded books and why? (We exclude the OBVIOUS canon — 1984, Animal Farm, Brave New World, etc.)
Here are some of mine. 1 on philosophy, 2 on pre-WW1 history, 2 SF novels about war and revolution. I’m going to deliberately avoid anything published within the last 10-15 years if I can. Let’s look for classics. (all these are lazily from memory, so apologies for typos):

Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid by Douglas R. Hofstader”

Nearly 30 years old. A series of discussions ostensibly on music, computing, thought, philosophy, mathematics, art and consciousness.

Dreadnought, by Robert K. Massie.
http://dannyreviews.com/h/Dreadnought.html

A fascinating book. Admittedly it’s in my field so I’m biased. Well, one of my fields. A Naval history of Britain and Germany, leading up to the First World War, where the “lamps went out all over Europe and [were not] lit again…”.

The Guns of August, Barbara Tuchman. A classic. She writes very well. Lead up to WW1 from a more diplomatic/political/land perspective than the sea/naval perspective of Massie.

The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, Robert Heinlein. A great work of libertarian (science) fiction. Though not many regard Heinlein as a stylist, he certainly is one here, as his narrator has a limited and functional grasp of English.

Forever War, Joe Haldeman. A commie-pinko (I say that in jest, for new readers) SF antidote to Heinlein’s classic “Starship Troopers” (forget the film, read the book). Well written, and says a lot about America and the 1970’s. I don’t agree with him, but I think everyone should read what he wrote, and try to understand his perspective. I also think everyone should do the same with Heinlein.

Update: gwallan has mentioned Dune. I agree. I’ll add more to the update section as suggestions flow.
-wolfe

Happy Thanksgiving

Friday, November 24th, 2006

For those not in the States, well, have a great weekend. Blogging will probably be light, unlike the deluge of posts there’s been this week!

A letter probably describing the first Thanksgiving:

You shall understand, that in this little time, that a few of us have been here, we have built seven dwelling-houses, and four for the use of the plantation, and have made preparation for divers others.  We set the last spring some twenty acres of Indian corn, and sowed some six acres of barley and peas, and according to the manner of the Indians, we manured our ground with herrings or rather shads, which we have in great abundance, and take with great ease at our doors.  Our corn did prove well, and God be praised, we had a good increase of Indian corn, and our barley indifferent good, but our peas not worth the gathering, for we feared they were too late sown, they came up very well, and blossomed, but the sun parched them in the blossom.

Our harvest being gotten in, our governor sent four men on fowling, that so we might after have a special manner rejoice together after we had gathered the fruit of our labors; they four in one day killed as much fowl, as with a little help beside, served the company almost a week, at which time amongst other recreations, we exercised our arms, many of the Indians coming amongst us, and among the rest their greatest King Massasoit, with some ninety men, whom for three days we entertained and feasted, and they went out and killed five deer, which they brought to the plantation and bestowed on our governor, and upon the captain, and others.  And although it be not always so plentiful as it was at this time with us, yet by the goodness of God, we are so far from want that we often wish you partakers of our plenty.

Happy Thanksgiving!
-wolfe

On language

Tuesday, November 21st, 2006

If any regular reader finds my language objectionable, they’re welcome to complain. That said, I’m a bit tired of saying that I use ‘ladies’ in the same sense that I use ‘gentlemen’.

Since I’ve gotten a bunch of email from (not regular readers or commenters), I’m going to post on this.

In the academic world there’s been a tremendous uprising and counter-attack against men who use the term ‘ladies’ or ‘lady’. The implication is that we want to put women in some kind of sexual box.

That’s largely rubbish. (Yeah, I would prefer both men and women in a similar sexual box; that’s it. I despise denial of women’s sexuality, and I don’t want to force anyone to do anything.)

I use the term ‘girls’ to mean immature females of the human species. These can sometimes be 20-25 year old females. Is Paris Hilton a girl? I’d say yes.

I use the term ‘boys’ similarly, though of course I’m cognizant of the racial terminology involved in ‘boy’.
Lad and lass I use to simply mean a young human capable of learning.

My female readers are ‘ladies’ to me.

They may not all behave as ladies, but they mostly do, and I honor them with that term, which I view as a mark of honor, not deprecation.

My male readers are ‘gentlemen’, similarly. They may at times be jerks, but I expect them to adhere to a code of conduct, and I honor them as such.

Yeah, I’m a bit ticked off at the crap I’m getting. So be it. This is how I see the world; I shall not change, even if I get 100 or 1000 emails instead of 20, all sent within the same 45 minutes, on the same subject.

It is annoying in that it’s preventing me from replying rapidly to long-time readers.

I make some posts women can disagree with. Fine. But hang me for what I am, don’t  give me the crap that because I refer to female readers as “ladies” that I have some contempt for them.

That’s a repulsive argument.

Best to all, ladies, gentlemen, and even those who don’t feel they are ladies or gentlemen. My readers are ladies and gentlemen. I hope.
-wolfe

The Cause of our Times

Tuesday, November 21st, 2006

lebanese_hezbollah_recruts_being_sworn_in.jpg
A lot of people thought we stopped this garbage
back in the 1940’s. Guess we didn’t. Nice salutes.
Photo credit: Szzuhzaila Sazzhmarani,
Agence France Press, via Wikipedia.

 

These are Hezbollah fighters saluting, ready to be martyrs for The Cause. Perversely, this is Martyr’s Day, 11 November 2006. Lebanon is asking the US to remove Hezbollah from the list of terrorist groups. Because … uh… well, they just want to kill Jews. They don’t really want to kill Americans. Unless, you know, they have to.

There’s an evil at work here that we ignore at our peril. For a shining nanosecond, Gloria Steinem looks good. Then I realize feminism is in league with these monsters.

NB- I have inserted Z’s in the stringer’s name so that he’s not identified in a google search with this website which opposes Islamofascism. Don’t want him being hurt over something I write. For his actual name, remove the Z’s.

-wolfe

A reason why I’m not libertarian.

Monday, November 20th, 2006

The traditional Libertarian argument is that you’ve a right to swing your fists as much as you want to (that’s a manly metaphor, for the slow readers amongst us) provided you don’t hit another’s nose.

Regular poster Teri is an awesome combination of left, right and libertarian. I regularly disagree with her, but she knows her mind and responds accordingly.

She said, on a recent thread:

I also think I should have the right not to wear a seatbelt or a helmet. I hate being micro-managed.

Well, she’s right and wrong.

I am not making up a single word of my response to this. Not that I normally do, but I might well spin a detail to tell a better story. I try to be a story-teller on this blog as well as a blogger. On stories I tell, I certainly shift the facts to protect people’s real-life identities; I also do so, as I say, to tell a better story. A conversation that occurred over two months might be condensed into 20 words. So be it.

Here I shall give you the unvarnished facts.

I was 17. Driving. With my mother. Oh God.

What worse punishment can you inflict upon a young man (or an older woman)?

She has the terror of not possessing his reflexes, and not knowing if he really knows what he’s doing. It wasn’t until years later that I realized that wheeling into a tight parking space at speed and relying on a downshift and brake combination to stop me was very disturbing to women. So much for sensitive Wolfe.

But leave that aside. The (true) story is this. I was approaching a red light in our aging 1980’s car. My mother screamed “STOP!!!”. I braked, being very uncertain as to what was happening and modulating the breaking so as to ensure we slowed then stopped about a foot short of the line.

I had about 250 milliseconds to recover from that unholy screech when WHAM!

WHAM!

WHAM!

WHAM!

we were run into repeatedly. Three to four times.
Whiplash city. Dull pain in my lower back.

Somehow, my brain processed the fact that I had to keep my foot on the brake.

Shaken, I picked up my glasses. My mother did the same. Then we realized we’d put each others’ glasses on.

After an embarrassing moment with my first cross-dressing experience (are glasses really gender-oriented?) we exchanged them. I put the vehicle in park, turned off the ignition, and asked her to call the police on her Cell.

I staggered out, wincing. I approached the 1970’s vehicle that had hit us, painted a hideous, well, forgive me, but this was the color… a hideous “shit brown”.

The elderly lady (probably 70 to 80) inside was semi comatose. I opened the door. I said loudly “Ma’am are you OK?” I repeated it, twice. (that means 3 times in total for those who’ve suffered from socialized education).

She stirred, and looked up at me perkily.

“Hi there!” she said.

“You’re ok, ma’am?” I was angry at her for smashing into me, but I was disoriented more than anything else. I did have enough presence to know I needed to call an ambulance, stat, if she was hurt.

She looked up at me and smiled sunnily, exposing her British dentist’s work.

“Oh…” she said, feebly, still smiling.

“Are you all right ma’am?”

“I braked.”

“Yes ma’am, but you didn’t stop.”

I was somewhat glacial.

She responded “Well, I wasn’t wearing this silly seatbelt and my head hit the window [windshield]….”

Yeah.

OK. So she didn’t want to wear her seatbelt so she slammed into me again and again and again.

My back is still a bit f-d up from that.

It was her choice; I paid the cost.

Sure, I could massively sue her, but why the #$(*) do that?

The

WHAM

WHAM

WHAM

where she kept bumping my car forward and slamming into me?

Yeah, she had the right to do so, I paid the cost.

And that’s where I draw the line. Where someone else has a right, and you pay the cost.

Especially when it’s something so trivial.

That’s why I moved towards being a conservative, rather than a libertarian. Libertarians were filled with imaginative but not very realistic solutions, mainly involving me suing her. She was an elderly lady. I didn’t want to do that.

Nevertheless, her choice of not wearing a seatbelt meant additional injury to me.

-wolfe

Exciting New Stars for next Harry Potter!

Monday, November 20th, 2006

You heard it here first. George W. Bush and Vladimir “Pooty-poot” Putin starring as new wizard masters at Hogwarts. Whoever got all those leaders to dress up in those robes has quite the sense of humor. Somewhere there’s a picture with China’s leader and those two, but this one is slightly funnier.

Bush and Putin in Wizard's Robes. Or something.
New Hogwarts Headmaster George W. Bush explains
his techniques to new Defence Against the Dark Arts teacher
Vladimir Putin. Or Something.
Photo: Daily Mail, UK. No credited photographer.

What’s even weirder is that the ao dai (as those robes are more correctly known) is more frequently used as a wedding dress or formal girls’ school uniform.

So whoever managed to persuade the leaders of the world to dress up in the Vietnamese equivalent of a tartan minikilt, blouse, and stockings must be some negotiator. Sneaky Commies.

It’s a wonder the Vietnam war lasted as long as it did.

-wolfe

Silicone Breast Implants Legal again! Whoo-hoo!

Monday, November 20th, 2006

This is going to be very long, and it won’t feature a picture of any breasts. Much though I’m tempted.

Am I happy silicone implants are legal again? Actually, yes and no.

Having implants — even the relatively simple inflatable ones where they go in through the belly-button — seem like a really, really bad idea.

In my view, no one should get cosmetic surgery, unless it’s to repair some form of damage. (Mind you, damage can be in the eye of the beholder, there’s the rub).

If a woman is a victim of breast cancer, and has had a mastectomy, then, yeah, I don’t disagree with her desire to “repair the damage”. I also don’t disagree with her if she wants to be as she is.

And any man who pressures his wife to ‘restore’ her breast(s) because of a mastectomy is scum. Much less a man who pressures her to have implants/restore them to youth.

We love who we love. And while I wouldn’t love a grossly fat body of a woman who let herself go, I wouldn’t care a nanosecond about her appearance were she hit with cancer. I hope, though am not convinced, that the converse would be true.

So why do I go whoo-hoo! on this?

Simple. I value science over litigation.

Democrats — and the left in general — argue that Republicans don’t value science.

There’s a tiny modicum of truth there — conservatives, for example, did staunchly — and some do today — resist evolution. I don’t know why. To me it’s a no brainer that a) a loving God created us and; b) something akin to evolution occurred; and, c) where is my PS3?

But the converse holds true at least as strongly. If you don’t hold to the right views on Climate change (see State of Fear, for example), then, well, you’re on the wrong track.

And litigators love abusing science. I have as much contempt for the Democrats for running John Edwards, litigation lawyer, as their VP candidate in ‘04, as I would for the Republicans digging out Scope’s opponent’s out of the grave.

Edwards, and his ilk made a horrible argument. There were babies being born with Cerebral Palsy, he said (and he even channeled a baby’s thoughts via a seance like approach in front of a jury) and so women had to have Cesarean sections. To not do so was to condemn the baby to CP.

Never mind that it created more scarring, more vectors for infection, higher costs, and, arguably, longer recovery for women.

It made the lawyers billions.

Literally.

And so, the science is in. C-sections are mostly a bad idea.

Yet they’re done, overwhelmingly, in any country that has contact with the US. Sometimes the patient has to fight strongly to prevent her doctors from doing this! There’s no scientific evidence for it, but the pressure of Edwards (winner of hundreds of millions in (IMO) specious damages) and his ilk made it happen.

Silicone breast implants?

Same thing.

Asinine in that case, and involved the bankruptcy of Dow Corning.

And finally, the FDA said “Oops”.

Make no mistake.

I don’t think women should worry at all about their breasts, other than to wear a good sports-bra while exercising, and be well-fitted. And, sure, wear a push-up bra on a date, we men are simple creatures at times. I rock at giving boobie advice. Borat High-fived me.

But the annihilation of companies by lawyers and terror of women based on utter nonsense? Well that’s crap.

And, ultimately, the same thing — how do we read science — comes down to climate change. And there’s where it may kill us or brutally destroy our welfare, as a society.

If you’re a woman, and you read through this, post away, please. Otherwise I might just do only boobie pics.

Respectfully submitted,

-wolfe

Engender Truth

Monday, November 20th, 2006

I’m a bit silent these days, since I’m busy conducting some negotiations for a company upon who’s board I sit. It’s interesting. I feel like a medieval ambassador between city-states… which I suppose is what corporations these days are — to some degree. Albeit weak city states. To the many emails I haven’t yet responded to, my apologies.

But I do wish to draw attention to Luka’s blog, Engender Truth. She’s posting almost often enough for me to permanently blogroll her (hint, hint). And certainly deserves this post which has been in my edit-queue for a week.

She lacks at managing images, and manages to post them all-out-of-scale (email me), but it’s still very good.

She’s finishing off her undergrad and is posting about an essay a week. Do Click on “MORE >>” beside her writings or you’ll find yourself pining for the colour of… Friday Boobies — even if you’re a heterosexual female! (Her site only gives brief snippets of her essays otherwise. And maybe you won’t find yourself pining for Friday boobies… but you’ll find yourself pining for something if you don’t click MORE).

She’s an essay detailing how she was ejected from feministing; (no link; they don’t deserve it). Basically, like Grump, she was booted as a troll. Sad, but true.

There’s a lot I could quote on that link, and a lot I could say, but basically she’s got what’s wrong. Men are viewed as crap and discriminated against.

Oh in fairness, the converse is, sadly, still true in some places. But not many. And no, Female, not the ones you think it is.

Luka’s above essay is excellent, but I really like the one I’m about to quote.
What is your Honour Code“?

Here, Luka quotes two poets from the Commonwealth:

To open this post I am going to introduce you to two poems which resonate very deeply within me. The first poem is called ‘If’ written by Rudyard Kipling (1865 – 1936) and the second poem is called ‘The invitation’ written by Oriah Mountain Dreamer. These are two poems which guide me in my own morality throughout my life; they teach me what it means to be a decent, honourable and real human being. To me, what both poets write is a challenge to the reader to think about what their personal honour code is.

Now, having praised Luka, I’m going to bury her. She quotes a great poet and she quotes someone who, in my opinion, writes steaming odoriferous piles of uh… well, I’ve taken this metaphor about as far as I can and still hope to have Luka speak to me. And, I am speaking slightly tongue in cheek.

For, in fact, both Kipling and Oriah suffer from a very similar problem. Neither, in fact, are great poets, though what they write can be very moving. Extremely moving.

Both are extremely gender-oriented; Kipling is very much a man’s poet. Oriah, very much a woman’s.

Oriah doesn’t move me. Kipling does. Yet of the two, Oriah is certainly more emotional.

No insult is intended to Luka on this: it’s clear we differ in our views, and it’s a gender based difference. It’s to her great credit that she gets as much out of Kipling as she does. It’s perhaps not to my credit that I don’t get anything out of Oriah… or maybe Oriah just isn’t as good. That’s for posterity to decide.

In any event, do read Luka’s blog, and woman, Post More! At least once a week! Do that and you’re blogrolled!

Kipling shall be this weeks’s Sunday Sonnet. I think.

-wolfe