Part of the MABTW blog network - Last Updated Blog - El Chauvinisto

Archive for November, 2006

“And on the third day…”

Monday, November 20th, 2006

A couple of short videos (10s and ~2 minutes) that I found amusing…

Some may find this mildly offensive, but I have to admit I found it funny. No nudity, no swearing, the very religious, the very gay, the very redneck, the very pro/anti-evolution might be offended. Should be worksafe unless your workplace falls into one of the above categories.

And this bizarre (lightly edited) security cam footage is… well, let’s just say it shows probably the dumbest burglar in the universe. How he can still walk, I do not know. Worksafe, unless you work for the chap in the video. (hat tip instapundit for this one).

-wolfe

Milton Friedman dies at 94

Thursday, November 16th, 2006

a set of social institutions that stresses individual responsibility, that treats the individual … as responsible for and to himself, will lead to a higher and more desirable moral climate.

– Milton Friedman, Is Capitalism Humane?

At 5′3″, tiny in physical stature, but an intellectual giant amongst post-war economists, Nobel Laureate and libertarian economist Milton Friedman is dead today at age 94.

Milton and Rose Friedman
Milton and Rose Friedman.
Credit: cover, “Two Lucky People“.

How did his life affect yours? Well, if you live in a highly developed country, the odds are pretty good that you live in a country with relatively low inflation, and relatively high employment by historical standards.

You can put a great deal of that down to Friedman and the Chicago school who managed to persuade the world that Keynesian (named for British economist John Maynard Keynes) economic approach was something of a disaster if you wanted low unemployment and low inflation.

Born in New York in 1912 to working-class Jewish immigrants from what is now the Ukraine, Friedman graduated from the Rutgers in 1932, and the University of Chicago (M.A.) in 1933. Though he worked briefly at the University of Wisconsin, he the prevailing climate quite antisemitic.

At Chicago, he met and fell in love with Rose Director. Six years later, after they felt more financially secure, they married, and remained married for over 65 years. She was also a highly intelligent economics student and helped him a great deal with his research.

After working for the Federal Government during the balance of the Depression and War, he graduated from Columbia with his PhD in 1946.

He spent the next 30 years at the University of Chicago, and was a founder of the justly-famed ‘Chicago School’ of economic thought.
In the early 1950’s he began studying monetarism. At the time, everyone thought he was crazy; this was a dead horse. Keynesian theory was the order of the day, the received wisdom. Moreover, Friedman not only was arguing that monetarism was an important component; he was arguing it was essentially the only component in managing inflation and unemployment in an advanced economy.

Friedman’s views weren’t merely controversial in the field of economics. He was difficult to pigeonhole, best being described as a classic laissez-faire liberal, or a modern-day libertarian. Certainly conservatives liked many of his economic prescriptions (lower taxes, reduce spending, balance the budget, fight inflation), but tended to shy away from his social prescriptions (legalize drugs).

Above all else, Friedman believed in freedom. He didn’t like the idea of a businessman, or a trade-unionist, or a governmental official having too much power. He believed in personal responsibility, and, while he lauded many of the goals of the War on Poverty, he rightly excoriated the methods used as damningly harmful to those it attempted to help.

Friedman is survived by his wife Rose, his daughter Janet, his son David, and four grandchildren and three great-grandchildren.
-wolfe

Open thread for Women 2

Tuesday, November 14th, 2006

Same rules as the last one.

Sunday Sonnets 2

Saturday, November 11th, 2006

Technically it’s Saturday, but the day is so appropriate for this one. Sunday Sonnets 1 is on hold; sorry, but I’m not happy with what I’ve written. I’ll work on it over time.

In Flanders Fields
Lt. Colonel John Alexander McCrae, M.D.

In Flanders fields the poppies blow
Between the crosses, row on row,
That mark our place; and in the sky
The larks, still bravely singing, fly
Scarce heard amid the guns below.

We are the Dead. Short days ago
We lived, felt dawn, saw sunset glow,
Loved, and were loved, and now we lie
In Flanders fields.

Take up our quarrel with the foe:
To you from failing hands we throw
The torch; be yours to hold it high.
If ye break faith with us who die
We shall not sleep, though poppies grow
In Flanders fields.

The multitalented John McCrae was a Canadian poet, artist, author, physician, professor, surgeon, and soldier who served in the Canadian Army during the Boer War and World War I.

After interning at Johns Hopkins, and being offered a fellowship at McGill, he interrupted his medical work to serve in the Boer War in 1899. Though he said little, his African war experiences had clearly left him with complex feelings about war. While he still believed in the necessity of fighting to right wrongs, he was appalled at the brutality and suffering of soldiers, especially wounded soldiers. He resigned his commission as Major in 1904.

He published papers, continued to write poetry, traveled, drew, taught, and, of course, wound up serving again, as a field surgeon in World War I, serving on the Western front.

Over a horrific period in spring 1915, the Germans started using chemical weapons against Canadian troops. Casualties were terribly high, and McCrae insisted on living and working right at the front.to treat the wounded as rapidly as he could. He wrote his mother:

The general impression in my mind is of a nightmare. We have been in the most bitter of fights. For seventeen days and seventeen nights none of us have had our clothes off, nor our boots even, except occasionally. In all that time while I was awake, gunfire and rifle fire never ceased for sixty seconds ….. And behind it all was the constant background of the sights of the dead, the wounded, the maimed, and a terrible anxiety lest the line should give way.

On May the second, a student he’d mentored died: Lt. Alexis Helmer of Ottawa. There was not much left to bury; he was killed by an artillery shell. What there was, was gathered in a bag, fastened with safety pins. With no chaplain, and safety forbidding light, McCrae officiated at a brief funeral service, doing his Presbyterian best to remember the Anglican order of service, and Helmer was buried along with the rest.

On the evening of May the third, McCrae spent 20 minutes and wrote this poem.

Lt. Col. Edward Morrison, the CO at the scene described it (I thank Rob Ruggenberg for much of this content):

“This poem was literally born of fire and blood during the hottest phase of the second battle of Ypres. My headquarters were in a trench on the top of the bank of the Ypres Canal, and John had his dressing station in a hole dug in the foot of the bank. During periods in the battle men who were shot actually rolled down the bank into his dressing station.

Along from us a few hundred yards was the headquarters of a regiment, and many times during the sixteen days of battle, he and I watched them burying their dead whenever there was a lull. Thus the crosses, row on row, grew into a good-sized cemetery.

Just as he describes, we often heard in the mornings the larks singing high in the air, between the crash of the shell and the reports of the guns in the battery just beside us.

I have a letter from him in which he mentions having written the poem to pass away the time between the arrival of batches of wounded, and partly as an experiment with several varieties of poetic metre.”

The poem itself is a rondeau; a French form of poetry with a fixed, stylized form: 3 stanzas: a quintet, a quatrain, and a sextet. (Fancy words meaning 5 lines of poetry, 4 lines, 6 lines). The rhyming scheme is of the form A(R) A B B R, A A B R, and A A B B A R, where A represents one 8 syllable phrase ending in a particular rhyme, and B represents a different 8 syllable phrase ending in a different rhyme. The refrain, R, is typically based upon the opening line of the poem, but this need not be. It typically is also only 4 syllables, but some practitioners of the form differ.

The constrictions of the form are intended as a challenge to the poet to express himself/herself succinctly and poignantly. You can judge for yourself the degree to which he succeeded.

The third verse was often used by jingoistic governments to stir up patriotic fervor in support of that war, and future wars. Personally, I believe there is such a thing as just war, and that sometimes sacrifices — terrible sacrifices — must be made. But to simply quote that third verse in an ad for Victory Bonds, or in support of future wars without being very aware of the Hell on earth that McCrae and others endured would be a terrible act.

On November 11, we remember those who served, those who sacrificed, and those who have gone on before us.

With thanks to Rob Ruggenberg’s fine page on In Flanders Fields, Wikipedia, and Veterans Affairs Canada.

Winners and Losers

Wednesday, November 8th, 2006

It was a good night for Democrats, but not a historic one. A swing of 4 Senate seats (6, counting the independents as Democrat pickups) and a swing of 27 (counting a previous independent who caucused with the Democrats as a retention) is strong, but, surprisingly, slightly smaller than historic losses in the 6th year of a presidency.

(I’m assuming recounts will confirm Democratic victories in Virginia and Montana).

Charles Krauthammer, writing last Friday in the Washington Post noted that, post WW2, the average loss in the sixth year of a two-term president is 29 seats in the House, and 6 in the Senate.

That puts this very marginally below average, and at the high end of my own predictions (low 20’s for the House, 4-6 for the Senate).
Add in FDR’s second term, pre-war, and the House losses leap to 35 on average.

No question though, the Democrats are winners, and the Republicans are losers. (In the ‘be careful what you wish for’ category, I did express the hope that Webb would win even if it meant Republican control of the Senate. Looks like he has and that it does.)

Personally, I believe that had the Republicans somehow held on to both houses, their chances of winning the Presidential election in 2008 would have been near zero. Now? Non-zero.

My quick analysis:

Winners:

  • Nancy Pelosi, obviously. She’s now Madam Speaker.
  • James Webb D-Senate-Virginia. (assuming he squeaks through in the Senate). He’s a wild card but he could be a significant contender as VP nominee in ‘08 or ‘12.
  • Joe Lieberman. I-Senate-Connecticut. Hung tough and won as an independent.
  • Rahm Emmanuel. Chair of the DCCC — the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. Pushing towards the center, tireless fundraising, good candidate selection, and a Karl Rove-style determination to focus tactically on winnable races.
  • Olympia Snowe. R-Maine. You’re a Republican Senator. In a blue state. And you win 74% of the vote. In 2006. It’s hard to imagine what could dislodge her.
  • John McCain (Senator, R-Arizona). He campaigned heavily for a lot of races, and may have made a difference in some. He’s stored up some chits for 2008.
  • Anti-Corruption. Well at least some friends of the odious Jack Abramoff (crooked lobbyist with heavy Republican connections) went down to defeat.
  • Corruption. The Washington Post reports Alcyee Hastings will likely be nominated to head the Intelligence committee by Speaker Pelosi. Hastings was a staggeringly corrupt judge, and only the sixth in history to be impeached and removed from office by Congress and Senate. Jack Murtha will run for Majority Leader; some remember him as the man caught on tape by the FBI saying he ‘wasn’t interested… at this point’ in a bribe of $50,000, but that if he got to know the bribers a bit better, maybe they could work something out.
  • Some conservative/libertarian ideals. The Michigan Civil Rights Initiative looks to have passed. Essentially abandoned by the Republican party, good for Ward Connerly and Jennifer Gratz. Similarly, anti-Kelo measures to prevent government expropriating private property to turn it over to developers for private use have done well. The Republicans paid lip service to this, but didn’t seem really invested in the fight.

Losers:

  • George W. Bush. Oh, to be sure, he’s not a loser by “historic standards”, but the last two years of his presidency are going to be incredibly painful. He’ll get a chance to prove he’s a ‘uniter not a divider’, but don’t expect to see any great legislation he backs passing.
  • John F. Kerry. If you heard about his gaffe in the days before the election, you know whereof I speak. If you didn’t, he managed to bungle a bad joke aimed at Bush into an incredibly insulting remark about US soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines. Whether he’s stupid, arrogant, or just tone deaf no one knows. Or now cares.
  • Lincoln Chafee. R-Rhode Island, former Senator. One of the more anti-war Senators, and so anti-Bush he didn’t vote for him in ‘04!
  • George Allen (Former(?) R Senator for Virginia). Even if he doesn’t lose to Webb, his presidential aspirations are about as dead as John Kerry’s.
  • ‘Netroots’ Democratic activists who heavily supported toppling Lieberman and demonized the man as “Rape Gurney Joe”. A little more anger and he could have ended up caucusing with Republicans… and good-bye to the Democrats holding the Senate. Ideological purity is all well and good, but if you make your party too small, it just won’t win.
  • Optimistic Republicans who kept preaching the party wasn’t going to lose the house (much less the Senate).
  • Ideas. Neither party seemed to have any other than “Stay the course” and “George Bush is bad”. Contrast the 1994 Contract with America — Newt Gingrich was chock-full of ideas, some good, some bad.
  • Karl Rove. He doesn’t lose his “boy genius” status, but he gets a bit of tarnish to it, and he’s removed as the night-time terror for Democrats.

And now, just 12-14 months until the 2008 elections start heating up.

-wolfe

My predictions and Live Blogging.

Tuesday, November 7th, 2006

Well here’s my chance to fall flat on my face in US election predictions.

My summary? The Republicans deserve to lose; the Democrats do not deserve to win.

The Democrats will narrowly take the House by 4-8+ seats. (If the Democrats break 229, I’m an idiot prognosticator).

The Senate will stay very narrowly in Republican hands. (51/49 or so). If the Dems hit 52, I’m equally idiotic.

I could be setting myself up to look like a fool here if the Democrats achieve the blowout that some suggest. But, from talking with friends over some weeks, I’m comfortable with what I’m projecting.

Enough of projections, here are my hopes:

I’m hoping for Jim Webb (D) to win a slightly uphill struggle in Virginia, and Michael Steele (R) to win an uphill struggle in Maryland.

There’s nothing wrong (despite negative advertising) with their opponents; but both are very good men who’d have a profound impact on their respective parties. The Democrats need to move into the 20th century with Webb; the Republicans need to do so as well with Steele.

Bless, protect, and enlighten our candidates.

Take care all, and prepare for a hungover wolfe tomorrow if the Republicans lose horribly. And cheers to my Democratic readers who will no doubt be happy.

-wolfe

“You write like a Chick”

Tuesday, November 7th, 2006

PG-13 language warning.
This post is mainly for Luka, but it was something that didn’t really fit anywhere else — and I thought it worth exploring.

Insults based on gender, have, traditionally, in the eyes of women, been biased against women. There’s some truth to that; consider the two old-school terms we have to describe a man we don’t like:

  • bastard - his mother screwed around
  • son of a bitch - his mother was one.

Now consider:

  • “You throw like a girl!”
  • “You run like a girl!”

Feminists take all of these as denying women power, and being contemptuous of women. This is a self-indulgent and largely wrong view.

Does any man — or Dad — think how a girl throws is bad? Or how she walks? Or runs? The insult is not to the girl; but to the boy being targetted with it. (Yes, using ‘girl’ to describe adult women when one would use ‘men’ to describe adult men is wrong — that does deny women power and maturity).

Men and women are different. There appears — just look closely at photos — to be a greater angle at the elbow in women’s arms. Women’s pelvises (pelvi?) and legs are structured differently from men’s. There’s a grace to the way that many women move — perhaps taught, but probably also due to the fact that estrogen’s been shown to make the joints more flexible.
A number of worthy men struggle to emulate this — male gymnasts, dancers, etc.

Now. To the meat of the matter, and where Luka enters.

Someone on MABTW, seeing Sony and I were arguing (more accurately, trading barbs(Sony) and sarcasm(me) to no real good), hit Sony with the line “You write like a Chick”. After pondering briefly, I responded, saying it was inappropriate, insulting, etc.

Luka responded, at first appearing to be upset at me, but I couldn’t tell. I couldn’t see any rational reason for her being upset at the general remark. She then clarified what she wrote over here (I’ve moved her post here):

Sorry that this post is unrelated to the topic…you can move it if you like wolfe, but this is a response to you from your latest comment on MABTW…

Actually I am not stupid or missing any IQ I am just knackered, and it is late. I didn’t intend to come across as criticising what you have written, I do see the reasons and sense of justice behind your remarks to back up Sonyad.

My use of ‘disappointed’ was not to say that I was disappointed in YOU, just disappointed in the idea that being called a woman is such a henious crime, even on a place like MABTW… it wasn’t that I was really offended, upset or distressed by anything you wrote….I just felt a weary sadness about it… hard to explain.

I may not stay active in MABTW for much longer, it actually doesn’t benefit me to be involved anymore, I think I am outgrowing it…that is all I am going to say for the time being.

Apologies if you were offended by my latest comments on MABTW…not intentional. I am going to bed soon too!

Night!

Believe me, I know whereof she speaks when she writes of a “weary sadness” — especially concerning MABTW. I find a lot of what many people write there — at times including myself — to be of modest value at best. I enjoy Dick’s writing a great deal, and that’s the big draw for me.

disappointed in the idea that being called a woman is such a henious crime
This for me is the core of what Luka’s writing about (she might differ).

I don’t remotely see it the way she does, and that’s why I said she was out to lunch (and possibly suffering a deficit of IQ points that day). Apologies if you found either offensive; I doubt I’d make those statements here, but I did feel you were barking up the wrong tree anyway I looked at it.

No, really.

I believe men and women are quite different. There’s a huge overlap between the two, but they are different. Very different.

For the women on this site, suppose you walk into a room — a party, say. You meet some new people, and a woman looks you up and down and says “You walk like a man”.

Is this not insulting to you, highly so?

Yet is it insulting to men? At all?

Or if your mother, after observing your social behavior, says “You talk like a man”.

Insulted by that? I don’t know, I would be were I a woman.

But is that insulting how men talk? Or men?

No.

Telling a woman she talks (or walks) like a man, in the absence of very careful context and explanation, is an insult to that woman.

Telling a man he writes like a woman, in the absence of very careful context and explanation, is an insult to that man.

In neither case is a gender insulted.

So, Luka, the fact that I saw “write like a chick” as insulting to Sony didn’t for a moment mean I saw it as a negative quality in general, or a disparagement of women.

Respectfully submitted,

-wolfe

(Mostly) Happy News

Monday, November 6th, 2006

No one gets raped, or lashed, sentenced to death and nothing to do with elections in this interesting story.
Holland was gripped last week by what threatened to be a tragic tale: approximately one hundred horses trapped in a tiny area of land by rising seas last Wednesday.
Flash floods from a North Sea storm sent waters surging, and while a few horses were rescued by boat, further rescue had to be called off, ironically because the water was too shallow for boats, though still too deep for the horses to make it out safely.

I read about the story late last week, but it was only once I came across these pictures on the internet that I realized I wanted to blog it. Sometimes a picture truly is worth a thousand words.

Horses1

Horses 8

Horses 8a
Photo credits: AP photos, via BBC.
(Possibly Leeuwarder Courant/Catrinus van der Veen)?

Glad this story generally ended well, with the rescue of all the surviving horses, though sadly 19 horses did die earlier.

The horse owner is being investigated; AP reports that there were apparently storm warnings on Tuesday, which some say would have given  him plenty of time to move the herd behind protective dykes. (No, I won’t go for a joke about protective dykes. Too easy.)

Given the relationship between humans and horses, it behooves us to treat them better than these appeared to be treated last Wednesday as the floods hit.

-wolfe

Justice

Monday, November 6th, 2006

A man and a woman are together in a car. They are attacked by six men, kidnapped, and taken to a remote farmhouse where the woman is raped.

The event is filmed, so it’s pretty hard for any of those involved to deny the horror of what occurred — plus the male friend of the woman remains a witness.

The thugs try of course; they plead not guilty. Case goes to trial, four of the men are found guilty; the other two have not yet been found.

Sentences? Range from one to five years. Not much, considering the crime.

The one sentenced to one year gets 80 lashes.

The victim? She gets 90 lashes, as does her male friend. She wasn’t married to the man, and they were together in a car. That’s a nono in Saudi Arabia, which is where this occurred.

So… kidnapping and a brutal gang rape, filmed. The perps deny responsibility, are found guilty… and the victim gets more lashes than one of the perps does?

Words don’t cover how outrageous this is. But recall the Imam that Female wrote about — Australia’s top Muslim cleric who likened women to uncovered meat and suggested they invited sexual assault. It’s clear that here’s a justice system that agrees.

And remember, the Saudis are our allies…

-wolfe

Vote. Please do.

Sunday, November 5th, 2006

This is obviously aimed at Americans, but non-Americans may find my comments interesting. Apologies if you don’t.

I’d respectfully ask that you vote for people who treat the war seriously. For what it’s worth, I advance voted for a Democrat for Senate, because I believed that individual was more capable, and treated the war more seriously. I also think the Republicans collectively deserve to lose. (Sadly, I don’t think the Democrats collectively deserve to win).

US Flag

Yeah, I know, shock. wolfe votes Democrat. World ends. Film at 11.

Here are some Democrats (and Republicans) I like. Just 3 Senate races:

- James Webb D-Senate (VA). The guy’s an author, he makes me look like a pantywaist. The campaign has been a mudslinging mess; his Republican opponent is ok, but Webb is a better man.

I’ve no clue how the man got to be a Democratic nominee (other than opposition to the war), but his book Born Fighting is, imo, a must read.

- Michael Steele R-Senate (MD). He’s honest. Amazingly so. One of the first statewide black office-holders. Smart, capable, kinda funny. He won’t be your grandaddy’s Republican, he’ll be good — great — for my party. Check out his videos; they’re good.

- Harold Ford D-Senate (TN). Seems astonishingly forthright. (”You went to a playboy superbowl party”…. “Yes, I like girls and football”). Serious family issues, but seems possibly a man of integrity. Would be first black senator from TN since reconstruction. I have to say that eliminates some of my doubts. Yeah, that’s biased of me. Too bad. Like Steele — and Webb — he’d be good for his party.

I’d be happy to see all 3 elected.

But get out and vote; encourage your friends to do so. This is a mid-term election, but it’s an important one.

-wolfe