Part of the MABTW blog network - Last Updated Blog - El Chauvinisto

Archive for the ‘Blogroll’ Category

Say No to Crack

Wednesday, December 6th, 2006

An amusing, and fairly clean humor website, even if they do descend to (literal) toilet humor. Anita Bath (ha, funny) has posted here, and not even asked for a blog mention. So she gets one!

Have you ever been sitting in a restaurant and wondered: “Gee, why do they place toilets in a separate room?� Or … when taking time away from dinner to dispose of some hazardous waste, have you thought: “I’d much rather eat in here, how homey!� Well, if you are among the 3 non-institutionalized people who have thought this, now there’s a restaurant for you:

toilet restaurant 1

Yes, those are toilets IN the restaurant. Bowls are also shaped like toilets, dessert dishes like bidets/urinals

I’m directly stealing their bandwith with a direct link to a photo on their site here, but I think they’ll let me get away with it since it’s a post promoting their site. If not, let me know.
They appear to offer ‘cash prizes’, which makes me think that they have some capital backing and readership goals, but hey, again, she didn’t ask for a link, and I do find the site amusing.

Not quite as good writing as Diesel, but very good nevertheless.

-wolfe

Luka’s Temporary(?) Blog here…

Thursday, November 30th, 2006

Luka’s cool, I owe her a debt of explanation why I detest the rhymes of one of her favorite poets.

She’s highly rational — doesn’t make her right, but she’s always prepared to discuss why she isn’t.

Her aim is to have a site that discusses gender in a sensible way. If you’re a new reader, I highly recommend her; if you’re an old reader, you know her. Check her out here. Her rules are grossly similar to mine.

Take care, Luka,

And you’re blogrolled, baby, as “Wonderful Luka”! (sorry, even Diesel had to endure being called “baby” by me when I blogrolled him!)

-wolfe-baby.

Good books to read.

Wednesday, November 29th, 2006

UPDATE: 30 November 2006. a) I didn’t link Diesel; remedied. He inspired this post. b) Diesel’s brother-in-law, John, died earlier this week. Please keep John and his family in your thoughts and, where if you pray, in your prayers.

“Yes. All the books have to be in English.”

“So no Pynchon or Joyce?”

Diesel

Alas, I’m posting too slowly… So, here’s where I steal someone else’s idea, respond to it, and turn it into a post.

These are just a few rapidly sketched thoughts. What are your favorite slightly lesser-known/intellectually regarded books and why? (We exclude the OBVIOUS canon — 1984, Animal Farm, Brave New World, etc.)
Here are some of mine. 1 on philosophy, 2 on pre-WW1 history, 2 SF novels about war and revolution. I’m going to deliberately avoid anything published within the last 10-15 years if I can. Let’s look for classics. (all these are lazily from memory, so apologies for typos):

Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid by Douglas R. Hofstader”

Nearly 30 years old. A series of discussions ostensibly on music, computing, thought, philosophy, mathematics, art and consciousness.

Dreadnought, by Robert K. Massie.
http://dannyreviews.com/h/Dreadnought.html

A fascinating book. Admittedly it’s in my field so I’m biased. Well, one of my fields. A Naval history of Britain and Germany, leading up to the First World War, where the “lamps went out all over Europe and [were not] lit again…”.

The Guns of August, Barbara Tuchman. A classic. She writes very well. Lead up to WW1 from a more diplomatic/political/land perspective than the sea/naval perspective of Massie.

The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, Robert Heinlein. A great work of libertarian (science) fiction. Though not many regard Heinlein as a stylist, he certainly is one here, as his narrator has a limited and functional grasp of English.

Forever War, Joe Haldeman. A commie-pinko (I say that in jest, for new readers) SF antidote to Heinlein’s classic “Starship Troopers” (forget the film, read the book). Well written, and says a lot about America and the 1970’s. I don’t agree with him, but I think everyone should read what he wrote, and try to understand his perspective. I also think everyone should do the same with Heinlein.

Update: gwallan has mentioned Dune. I agree. I’ll add more to the update section as suggestions flow.
-wolfe

Engender Truth

Monday, November 20th, 2006

I’m a bit silent these days, since I’m busy conducting some negotiations for a company upon who’s board I sit. It’s interesting. I feel like a medieval ambassador between city-states… which I suppose is what corporations these days are — to some degree. Albeit weak city states. To the many emails I haven’t yet responded to, my apologies.

But I do wish to draw attention to Luka’s blog, Engender Truth. She’s posting almost often enough for me to permanently blogroll her (hint, hint). And certainly deserves this post which has been in my edit-queue for a week.

She lacks at managing images, and manages to post them all-out-of-scale (email me), but it’s still very good.

She’s finishing off her undergrad and is posting about an essay a week. Do Click on “MORE >>” beside her writings or you’ll find yourself pining for the colour of… Friday Boobies — even if you’re a heterosexual female! (Her site only gives brief snippets of her essays otherwise. And maybe you won’t find yourself pining for Friday boobies… but you’ll find yourself pining for something if you don’t click MORE).

She’s an essay detailing how she was ejected from feministing; (no link; they don’t deserve it). Basically, like Grump, she was booted as a troll. Sad, but true.

There’s a lot I could quote on that link, and a lot I could say, but basically she’s got what’s wrong. Men are viewed as crap and discriminated against.

Oh in fairness, the converse is, sadly, still true in some places. But not many. And no, Female, not the ones you think it is.

Luka’s above essay is excellent, but I really like the one I’m about to quote.
What is your Honour Code“?

Here, Luka quotes two poets from the Commonwealth:

To open this post I am going to introduce you to two poems which resonate very deeply within me. The first poem is called ‘If’ written by Rudyard Kipling (1865 – 1936) and the second poem is called ‘The invitation’ written by Oriah Mountain Dreamer. These are two poems which guide me in my own morality throughout my life; they teach me what it means to be a decent, honourable and real human being. To me, what both poets write is a challenge to the reader to think about what their personal honour code is.

Now, having praised Luka, I’m going to bury her. She quotes a great poet and she quotes someone who, in my opinion, writes steaming odoriferous piles of uh… well, I’ve taken this metaphor about as far as I can and still hope to have Luka speak to me. And, I am speaking slightly tongue in cheek.

For, in fact, both Kipling and Oriah suffer from a very similar problem. Neither, in fact, are great poets, though what they write can be very moving. Extremely moving.

Both are extremely gender-oriented; Kipling is very much a man’s poet. Oriah, very much a woman’s.

Oriah doesn’t move me. Kipling does. Yet of the two, Oriah is certainly more emotional.

No insult is intended to Luka on this: it’s clear we differ in our views, and it’s a gender based difference. It’s to her great credit that she gets as much out of Kipling as she does. It’s perhaps not to my credit that I don’t get anything out of Oriah… or maybe Oriah just isn’t as good. That’s for posterity to decide.

In any event, do read Luka’s blog, and woman, Post More! At least once a week! Do that and you’re blogrolled!

Kipling shall be this weeks’s Sunday Sonnet. I think.

-wolfe

Link of the day

Thursday, November 2nd, 2006

Just when I began to wonder if MABTW had descended into nothing but flaming over gun control/religion/women and all the good writers (save Dick) had left, I came across Diesel.

Total absolute nonsense, but gloriously so:

The idea was to come up with a story that explained the nickname yet was so absurd and out of character for me that there’s absolutely no way anyone would ever believe it. But, as generally happens, I completely lost control over the direction of the post about a sentence and a half in, and the result is something like an abbreviated version of Cool Hand Luke as imagined by Quentin Tarantino.

(Language, content advisory).

[I] planted that red hot tip on my chest, right between the D and the E. When I had torched a real purdy letter I, I took a nice long drag and said, “I before E, shitheads.”

Well, I don’t have to explain why I like that. The contrast between a semi-illiterate gang-banger and someone reciting spelling rules… Oh wait, I did explain it. My bad.

It’s a new blog, and he’s clearly going to significant efforts to promote it (unlike my laziness/unwillingness to do so). He’s probably worth reading.

Check him out, content advisory, etc.  Do note that the post I linked is uncharacteristic, though a good example of his writing.
-wolfe

Dakota Smith Rants

Sunday, September 24th, 2006

…is the name of Dakota Smith’s new blog on the mabtw network.

Dakota’s intelligent, courteous, writes well, and tends to be not without opinion. Coupled with a strong libertarian perspective, I’m sure this will make excellent fodder for a very fine blog.
I suspect he and I will find lots to agree on, and lots to ‘agree to disagree’ on. I respectfully look forward to both.

His first post, “Are Androids better than Women?” probably falls more into the second category, but there’s a tremendous amount of meat in there. Just one small snippet:

Then there’s the issue of fidelity. In a 2002 Canada Globe and Mail article, it was reported that researchers have discovered that 10% of all children weren’t sired by the woman’s husband.

Consider that for a moment: 10% of all children have a father other than their familial one. Since not every sexual intercourse leads to pregnancy (indeed, as a father, I know it really can be work to produce a child), this hints at tremendous numbers of women who routinely cheat on their husbands. If one out of ten are getting pregnant by someone else, how many are cheating but are smart enough to use birth control? 50%? 75%? No study can adequately guage, because the majority of women would lie to the poll-taker.

Maybe he’ll have me preferring gyndroids yet…

Do please keep in mind that he’ll have his own rules on posting which will differ somewhat from those that are here — i.e., you’re in his living room over there.

The comments for this post here are for Female (and any others who wish to talk about Dakota’s blog or its contents without posting there). In Female’s case, I understand she and Dakota have agreed she’s not going to post at his blog site.

Good luck Dakota!

-wolfe