Part of the MABTW blog network - Last Updated Blog - El Chauvinisto

Archive for the ‘gender’ Category

Little Miss Adventure

Tuesday, January 30th, 2007

From wolfe’s Musings:

An oft-heard complaint on menarebetterthanwomen.com is that well, western women today behave in an atrocious manner. Sometimes this happens at the behest of men. The classic ‘Girls Gone Wild‘ (links to a video, safe for most workplaces, but may contain religiously offensive content) approach.

Increasingly, however, it seems as though young women are plundering new depths of depravity and folly entirely on their own initiative.

Whether it’s dressing in a trashy and unprofessional fashion, then being surprised at being regarded as trashy and unprofessional, or going to a strange man’s hotel room at 2am, or crawling into bed falling down drunk with a strange man, or … well, there are plenty of examples.

Here’s a rather interesting story (and example) that’s been circulating by email. I quote it in full over at my main blog. The story begins with a young woman who is fighting drunk, abusive, biting, spitting. She weighs maybe 100 pounds, and is brought into the ER since she managed to fall down and hit her head.

Her blood alcohol level? .418. To put that in context, that’s a lethal does for 50% of humans. It’s the rough equivalent of a man having 20-24 drinks in a very short period of time.

But it gets better. Wait til you find out what her profession was. Streetwalker? Stripper? Oh, much better than that. You can read the whole story over at wolfe’s Musings. It’s long, but I think the payoff right at the end is worth it.

-wolfe

Women are better than men…

Monday, January 15th, 2007

at being cannibals.

At least that’s what the documentary I saw last night said. And since it was on TV, and mostly black and white, it must be true. (They hadn’t figured out how to lie on TV back in the days of black and white).

Seriously, it was a documentary[1] on the grisly siege of Leningrad in World War II. Horrible starvation and privation, lots of death, and a densely packed urban population that was dying off with inadequate food.

They’d find bodies that the soldiers had buried … dug up… and women coming home with “steaks” or “veal”. One elderly woman was surprisingly frank about it.

Overwhelmingly, 80-90% of the cannibals were women.

One is left with rather mixed feelings. I suppose a number of women and children survived that would not have, but it certainly puts to rest ideas of the “gentler sex”. Kipling was right about the female of the species

-wolfe

[1]Great citation “a documentary”, I know. It did feature Nigel Hawthorne narrating. So, hey, it must be true.

You can see more wolfe’s Musings at www.wolfesmusings.com

Woman beaten for refusing to move to back of bus

Tuesday, December 19th, 2006

I thought those days were over. You’ve got to wonder what was going through the head of those men… I mean asking a woman to move to the back of the bus doesn’t exactly have the best track record. Then you beat her for refusing? You’ve got to figure that’s going to play really, really badly in the media.

Where? Why the middle east of course. This time, though, it was Israel:

Miriam Shear says she was traveling to pray at the Western Wall in Jerusalem’s Old City early on November 24 when a group of ultra-Orthodox (Haredi) men attacked her for refusing to move to the back of the Egged No. 2 bus. She is now in touch with several legal advocacy and women’s organizations, and at the same time, waiting for the police to apprehend her attackers.

In her first interview since the incident, Shear says that on the bus three weeks ago, she was slapped, kicked, punched and pushed by a group of men who demanded that she sit in the back of the bus with the other women.

Of course, she may have deliberately provoked this; maybe she’s lying, but a purportedly unrelated (male) witness backs her story. The bus driver doesn’t, though if she’s telling the truth, he’d certainly have motivation to lie since he did nothing to stop the attack on her.

From the sound of it she’s an annoying uppity feminist.

Well, in places where women are being told to move to the back of the bus on public transportation, maybe we unfortunately need a few annoying uppity feminists.

NB- I don’t care if a private religious orthodox bus line wants to segregate by gender, but not if it receives a shekel of public funding. Indeed, if a private bus line wants to refuse to carry women at all, that’s fine with me. (Before any yelp at that, the 3 gyms nearest me are all women-only. I don’t like that, but I support their right to do it).

-wolfe

Open thread for Women 3

Saturday, December 16th, 2006

Same rules as the first one. This one will be linked in the sidebar.

Update: Other sidebar tweaks:

Added (which I thought I’d done) Say no to Crack and also Teri’s site, The road lester travelled.

Renamed “Wonderful Luka” to the more accurate “Engender Truth”, though I don’t think she’ll be posting much til post-Christmas.

Removed, alas, Dakota Smith’s blog link since he doesn’t seem active. If he does become active again, back up it shall go.

If you’re a regular reader and commenter and you’d like to be blogrolled, please let me know.

-wolfe

Engender Truth

Monday, November 20th, 2006

I’m a bit silent these days, since I’m busy conducting some negotiations for a company upon who’s board I sit. It’s interesting. I feel like a medieval ambassador between city-states… which I suppose is what corporations these days are — to some degree. Albeit weak city states. To the many emails I haven’t yet responded to, my apologies.

But I do wish to draw attention to Luka’s blog, Engender Truth. She’s posting almost often enough for me to permanently blogroll her (hint, hint). And certainly deserves this post which has been in my edit-queue for a week.

She lacks at managing images, and manages to post them all-out-of-scale (email me), but it’s still very good.

She’s finishing off her undergrad and is posting about an essay a week. Do Click on “MORE >>” beside her writings or you’ll find yourself pining for the colour of… Friday Boobies — even if you’re a heterosexual female! (Her site only gives brief snippets of her essays otherwise. And maybe you won’t find yourself pining for Friday boobies… but you’ll find yourself pining for something if you don’t click MORE).

She’s an essay detailing how she was ejected from feministing; (no link; they don’t deserve it). Basically, like Grump, she was booted as a troll. Sad, but true.

There’s a lot I could quote on that link, and a lot I could say, but basically she’s got what’s wrong. Men are viewed as crap and discriminated against.

Oh in fairness, the converse is, sadly, still true in some places. But not many. And no, Female, not the ones you think it is.

Luka’s above essay is excellent, but I really like the one I’m about to quote.
What is your Honour Code“?

Here, Luka quotes two poets from the Commonwealth:

To open this post I am going to introduce you to two poems which resonate very deeply within me. The first poem is called ‘If’ written by Rudyard Kipling (1865 – 1936) and the second poem is called ‘The invitation’ written by Oriah Mountain Dreamer. These are two poems which guide me in my own morality throughout my life; they teach me what it means to be a decent, honourable and real human being. To me, what both poets write is a challenge to the reader to think about what their personal honour code is.

Now, having praised Luka, I’m going to bury her. She quotes a great poet and she quotes someone who, in my opinion, writes steaming odoriferous piles of uh… well, I’ve taken this metaphor about as far as I can and still hope to have Luka speak to me. And, I am speaking slightly tongue in cheek.

For, in fact, both Kipling and Oriah suffer from a very similar problem. Neither, in fact, are great poets, though what they write can be very moving. Extremely moving.

Both are extremely gender-oriented; Kipling is very much a man’s poet. Oriah, very much a woman’s.

Oriah doesn’t move me. Kipling does. Yet of the two, Oriah is certainly more emotional.

No insult is intended to Luka on this: it’s clear we differ in our views, and it’s a gender based difference. It’s to her great credit that she gets as much out of Kipling as she does. It’s perhaps not to my credit that I don’t get anything out of Oriah… or maybe Oriah just isn’t as good. That’s for posterity to decide.

In any event, do read Luka’s blog, and woman, Post More! At least once a week! Do that and you’re blogrolled!

Kipling shall be this weeks’s Sunday Sonnet. I think.

-wolfe

Open thread for Women 2

Tuesday, November 14th, 2006

Same rules as the last one.

“You write like a Chick”

Tuesday, November 7th, 2006

PG-13 language warning.
This post is mainly for Luka, but it was something that didn’t really fit anywhere else — and I thought it worth exploring.

Insults based on gender, have, traditionally, in the eyes of women, been biased against women. There’s some truth to that; consider the two old-school terms we have to describe a man we don’t like:

  • bastard - his mother screwed around
  • son of a bitch - his mother was one.

Now consider:

  • “You throw like a girl!”
  • “You run like a girl!”

Feminists take all of these as denying women power, and being contemptuous of women. This is a self-indulgent and largely wrong view.

Does any man — or Dad — think how a girl throws is bad? Or how she walks? Or runs? The insult is not to the girl; but to the boy being targetted with it. (Yes, using ‘girl’ to describe adult women when one would use ‘men’ to describe adult men is wrong — that does deny women power and maturity).

Men and women are different. There appears — just look closely at photos — to be a greater angle at the elbow in women’s arms. Women’s pelvises (pelvi?) and legs are structured differently from men’s. There’s a grace to the way that many women move — perhaps taught, but probably also due to the fact that estrogen’s been shown to make the joints more flexible.
A number of worthy men struggle to emulate this — male gymnasts, dancers, etc.

Now. To the meat of the matter, and where Luka enters.

Someone on MABTW, seeing Sony and I were arguing (more accurately, trading barbs(Sony) and sarcasm(me) to no real good), hit Sony with the line “You write like a Chick”. After pondering briefly, I responded, saying it was inappropriate, insulting, etc.

Luka responded, at first appearing to be upset at me, but I couldn’t tell. I couldn’t see any rational reason for her being upset at the general remark. She then clarified what she wrote over here (I’ve moved her post here):

Sorry that this post is unrelated to the topic…you can move it if you like wolfe, but this is a response to you from your latest comment on MABTW…

Actually I am not stupid or missing any IQ I am just knackered, and it is late. I didn’t intend to come across as criticising what you have written, I do see the reasons and sense of justice behind your remarks to back up Sonyad.

My use of ‘disappointed’ was not to say that I was disappointed in YOU, just disappointed in the idea that being called a woman is such a henious crime, even on a place like MABTW… it wasn’t that I was really offended, upset or distressed by anything you wrote….I just felt a weary sadness about it… hard to explain.

I may not stay active in MABTW for much longer, it actually doesn’t benefit me to be involved anymore, I think I am outgrowing it…that is all I am going to say for the time being.

Apologies if you were offended by my latest comments on MABTW…not intentional. I am going to bed soon too!

Night!

Believe me, I know whereof she speaks when she writes of a “weary sadness” — especially concerning MABTW. I find a lot of what many people write there — at times including myself — to be of modest value at best. I enjoy Dick’s writing a great deal, and that’s the big draw for me.

disappointed in the idea that being called a woman is such a henious crime
This for me is the core of what Luka’s writing about (she might differ).

I don’t remotely see it the way she does, and that’s why I said she was out to lunch (and possibly suffering a deficit of IQ points that day). Apologies if you found either offensive; I doubt I’d make those statements here, but I did feel you were barking up the wrong tree anyway I looked at it.

No, really.

I believe men and women are quite different. There’s a huge overlap between the two, but they are different. Very different.

For the women on this site, suppose you walk into a room — a party, say. You meet some new people, and a woman looks you up and down and says “You walk like a man”.

Is this not insulting to you, highly so?

Yet is it insulting to men? At all?

Or if your mother, after observing your social behavior, says “You talk like a man”.

Insulted by that? I don’t know, I would be were I a woman.

But is that insulting how men talk? Or men?

No.

Telling a woman she talks (or walks) like a man, in the absence of very careful context and explanation, is an insult to that woman.

Telling a man he writes like a woman, in the absence of very careful context and explanation, is an insult to that man.

In neither case is a gender insulted.

So, Luka, the fact that I saw “write like a chick” as insulting to Sony didn’t for a moment mean I saw it as a negative quality in general, or a disparagement of women.

Respectfully submitted,

-wolfe

Justice

Monday, November 6th, 2006

A man and a woman are together in a car. They are attacked by six men, kidnapped, and taken to a remote farmhouse where the woman is raped.

The event is filmed, so it’s pretty hard for any of those involved to deny the horror of what occurred — plus the male friend of the woman remains a witness.

The thugs try of course; they plead not guilty. Case goes to trial, four of the men are found guilty; the other two have not yet been found.

Sentences? Range from one to five years. Not much, considering the crime.

The one sentenced to one year gets 80 lashes.

The victim? She gets 90 lashes, as does her male friend. She wasn’t married to the man, and they were together in a car. That’s a nono in Saudi Arabia, which is where this occurred.

So… kidnapping and a brutal gang rape, filmed. The perps deny responsibility, are found guilty… and the victim gets more lashes than one of the perps does?

Words don’t cover how outrageous this is. But recall the Imam that Female wrote about — Australia’s top Muslim cleric who likened women to uncovered meat and suggested they invited sexual assault. It’s clear that here’s a justice system that agrees.

And remember, the Saudis are our allies…

-wolfe

Monday Movies- Borat.

Sunday, November 5th, 2006

Borat: Cultural Learnings of America for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan

So we have Sunday Sonnets — working on finishing the first, the rest will be single posts, for I’ve learned; Friday Boobies, Saturday Songs, and, now, Monday Movies — reviews.

Thanks to those who sent Lawyers Guns and Money, and enabled my release. You know who you are. I’ll have to be careful partying with my old chum Borat in the future.

This film is emphatically not for children. Not at all. Features brief male nudity, disturbing scenes, and very disturbing dialog.
Whether it’s letting loose live chickens in a New York Subway, trying to kiss men from Brooklyn, or confusing the elevator in his hotel for his room, Sacha Baron Cohen’s bizarre blend of ignorance, naivete, anti-semitism, misogyny, and prejudice are powerful — and powerfully, though cringingly comic — tools in his journey across America.

A sample, as he interviews feminists in New York:

Borat: “In Khazakstan, is illegal for more than 5 women to be in same place except for brothel… So what it means, this feminism?”

Woman: It’s the theory that women should be equal to men [wild laughter from Borat] in matters social… You are laughing, that is a problem.

Borat: Do you think a woman should be educate?

Woman: Definitely.

Borat: But is it not a problem that women have smaller brain than man?

Woman: nearly speechless with anger

Borat: Give me a smile baby, it better for your face.

Woman, manfully summoning up patience: Well what you are saying is very demeaning…[continues]

Borat: (v/o, narrating) “I could not concentrate on what this old man was saying”.

There’s a magnificent bookend to this as he travels across Texas with a group of… I hate to say it, but well, rednecks (NB- I use the term with caution; I think careless use of it is racist). A group of good ‘ol boys who chat with Borat as follows:

Good ol’ Boy: You like the b—-s out there in the f—in old Russia there? … F— the S— out of them! The hos… you never call them again!

Borat: Why you don’t call them, because they don’t have telephone yes?

Man: No because they don’t have respect.

Horrible. Terrible. Sad, yet true.

And the scumbags talk about how minorities have more power, Jews have too much power, and they talk about slavery… “we wish — big shame”.

Jesus wept.
I’ve a lot of contempt for the kind of race-baiting that a few Democrats engage in. I despise the bigotry of some on the left.

Yet a bunch of these guys are conservatives. Disgusting. Contemptible. Repulsive. I laugh at their antics, but I’m not happy.
Stitched together from hours of outtakes of Americans reacting to Borat, combined with scripted scenes (with an added character; his producer) and a narrative voice-over that describes the loose plot of Borat’s journey to find Pamela Lee Anderson of Baywatch fame, it works incredibly well. It’s one of the most successful adaptations of a TV comic character to the big screen in decades. The Ali G movie was crap; this isn’t.

However deft the stylings of Baron Cohen [he does not hyphenate his surname, unlike his second cousin, Trinity college fellow Simon Baron-Cohen, professor of psychopathology at Cambridge, and author of some renowned works on autism, including some fascinating studies of gender and autism], one certainly winces at times. It’s emphatically not a film for children.

If you’re a small-screen fan of Borat, this is probably worth seeing in the theatre with friends. If you’re not, but enjoy South Park and the like, this is worth a look. If you’re neither, but have a good sense of humor, it’s probably worth renting down the road, if you’re planning on consuming some alcohol.

Rating:
8/10.

-wolfe

Friday Boobies 2!

Friday, October 20th, 2006

Boobies!

Ah yes, here we reconcile ourselves with the fact that we’re dealing with the blog of a heterosexual male who seems to like boobies. Not just the birds.

It’s an intriguing challenge for me. I’ve a number of (heterosexual female readers) [wolfe pauses to consider Female in the clutches of the #6 Humlon from Battlestar Galactica ...]

Where was I? Oh yes. To produce Friday Boobies! episodes that are quite sexual but not offensive. Or not totally. And I invite comment, especially constructive criticism.

Now, I could post the boobies of female posters, but no, no, that would be a shortcut at this stage. Better, yes, to focus on some form of commentary. And I am serious about this. Serially, as Al Gore would say.

Well mostly serial. Or seriously, as republicans might say.

Halloween costumes seem to be going in a somewhat depressing direction. I’m going to only post adult female ones, but there are a lot of them, this year, that seem to portray women as children/young teens. That’s… disturbing.

The New York Times comments on that. And upon women filling out a costume.

19cost11901.jpg

Photo From NY Times.More to follow, tonight, including maybe ‘Jake’.

(Seriously, needs more commentary, just in a rush to get to work.)