This is going to be very long, and it won’t feature a picture of any breasts. Much though I’m tempted.
Am I happy silicone implants are legal again? Actually, yes and no.
Having implants — even the relatively simple inflatable ones where they go in through the belly-button — seem like a really, really bad idea.
In my view, no one should get cosmetic surgery, unless it’s to repair some form of damage. (Mind you, damage can be in the eye of the beholder, there’s the rub).
If a woman is a victim of breast cancer, and has had a mastectomy, then, yeah, I don’t disagree with her desire to “repair the damage”. I also don’t disagree with her if she wants to be as she is.
And any man who pressures his wife to ‘restore’ her breast(s) because of a mastectomy is scum. Much less a man who pressures her to have implants/restore them to youth.
We love who we love. And while I wouldn’t love a grossly fat body of a woman who let herself go, I wouldn’t care a nanosecond about her appearance were she hit with cancer. I hope, though am not convinced, that the converse would be true.
So why do I go whoo-hoo! on this?
Simple. I value science over litigation.
Democrats — and the left in general — argue that Republicans don’t value science.
There’s a tiny modicum of truth there — conservatives, for example, did staunchly — and some do today — resist evolution. I don’t know why. To me it’s a no brainer that a) a loving God created us and; b) something akin to evolution occurred; and, c) where is my PS3?
But the converse holds true at least as strongly. If you don’t hold to the right views on Climate change (see State of Fear, for example), then, well, you’re on the wrong track.
And litigators love abusing science. I have as much contempt for the Democrats for running John Edwards, litigation lawyer, as their VP candidate in ‘04, as I would for the Republicans digging out Scope’s opponent’s out of the grave.
Edwards, and his ilk made a horrible argument. There were babies being born with Cerebral Palsy, he said (and he even channeled a baby’s thoughts via a seance like approach in front of a jury) and so women had to have Cesarean sections. To not do so was to condemn the baby to CP.
Never mind that it created more scarring, more vectors for infection, higher costs, and, arguably, longer recovery for women.
It made the lawyers billions.
Literally.
And so, the science is in. C-sections are mostly a bad idea.
Yet they’re done, overwhelmingly, in any country that has contact with the US. Sometimes the patient has to fight strongly to prevent her doctors from doing this! There’s no scientific evidence for it, but the pressure of Edwards (winner of hundreds of millions in (IMO) specious damages) and his ilk made it happen.
Silicone breast implants?
Same thing.
Asinine in that case, and involved the bankruptcy of Dow Corning.
And finally, the FDA said “Oops”.
Make no mistake.
I don’t think women should worry at all about their breasts, other than to wear a good sports-bra while exercising, and be well-fitted. And, sure, wear a push-up bra on a date, we men are simple creatures at times. I rock at giving boobie advice. Borat High-fived me.
But the annihilation of companies by lawyers and terror of women based on utter nonsense? Well that’s crap.
And, ultimately, the same thing — how do we read science — comes down to climate change. And there’s where it may kill us or brutally destroy our welfare, as a society.
If you’re a woman, and you read through this, post away, please. Otherwise I might just do only boobie pics.
Respectfully submitted,
-wolfe





![Dr. Zeresenay and the skull of 'Selam' [Pax, Peace]](http://wolfe.mabtw.com/files/2006/09/zerensenay_mpi_203b.jpg)



